Prospective analysis of the implications of using autonomous aerial systems in USAF Air Defense Interception Missions. From 2019 to 2035

Authors

  • Juan Camilo Correa Rubio Fuerzas Armadas

Keywords:

Autonomous UAS, USAF, Air defence, NORAD, FAA, Interception, loyal wingman

Abstract

Robotization of the battlefield is no longer a science fiction concept. Successful tests with autonomous weapon systems, give way to a new Revolution in Military Affairs, which is located in the incipient era of robotics and nano-technology. Through the construction and analysis of scenarios technique, four scenarios and their implications are studied, in air defense interception missions in US domestic airspace. Set as the horizon fiscal year 2035, the key concept within the autonomous UAS for this study is that of the loyal wingman.

References

BALOCH, Qadar B.; KAREEM, Nasir. Revisión de The Third Wave, por Alvin TOFFLER. The Journal of Managerial Sciences núm. 2. 2007, pp. 115-143.

BAQUÉS, Josep. «Revoluciones militares y revoluciones en los asuntos militares». En JORDÁN, Javier (coord.). Manual de estudios estratégicos y seguridad internacional. Madrid: Plaza y Valdés 2013, pp. 119-127.

BROWN, Donald. Bolts from Orion: Destroying mobile Surface-to-air Missile Systems with lethal autonomous aircraft. Alabama: Air Command and Staff College. Air University 2016.

BROWN, Sayom. «Scenarios in systems analysis». En QUADE E. S. y BOUCHER W. I. (coords.). Systems analysis and policy planning: applications in defense. Santa Monica, California: The RAND Corporation 1968, pp. 298-310.

BURNS, Brian S. Autonomous Unmanned Aerial Vehicle rendezvous for automated aerial refueling. Tesis. Ohio: Air Force Institute of Technology 2007.

CHEATER, Julian C. Accelerating the kill chain via future Unmanned Aircraft. Air War College 2007.

DEWEERD, Harvey A. Political-military scenarios. Santa Monica, California: The RAND Corporation 1967.

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION. Air Traffic Plans and Publications. Washington D.C.: 2019 [consultado el 6 de abril de 2019]. Disponible en https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/#manuals.

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION. FAA Strategic Plan. FY 2019-2022. Washington D.C.: 2019.

FRANTZ, Natalie R. Swarm intelligence for autonomous UAV control. Tesis. California: Naval Postgraduate School 2005.

GILLESPIE, Tony; WEST, Robin. «Requirements for autonomous unmanned air systems set by legal issues».The International C2 Journal núm. 2. 2010, pp. 1-30.

GLADE, David. Unmanned Aerial Vehicles: implications for military operations. Alabama: Air War College 2000.

GUETLEIN, Mike. Lethal autonomous weapons. Ethical and doctrinal implications. Rhode Island: Naval War College 2005.

JORDÁN, Javier. «La técnica de construcción y análisis de escenarios en estudios de seguridad y defensa». Análisis GESI 24/2016. Grupo de Estudios en Seguridad Internacional 2016.

JORDÁN, Javier. «Un modelo explicativo de los procesos de cambio en las organizaciones militares. La respuesta de Estados Unidos después del 11-S como caso de estudio». Revista de Ciencia Política núm.1. 2017, pp. 203-226.

LOCKHEED MARTI, N. U.S. Air Force, Lockheed Martin demonstrate manned/unmanned teaming. Maryland: 2017 [consultado el 30 de enero de 2019]. Disponible en https://news.lockheedmartin.com/2017-04-10-U-S-Air-Force-Lockheed-Martin-Demonstrate-Manned-Unmanned-Teaming

MANSON, Katherine. «Robot soldiers, stealth-jets and drone armies: the future of war». Financial Times. 16/11/2018. Disponible en https://www.ft.com.

MOUSAZADEH, Reza et al. «Analyzing the legal dimensions of Unmanned Combat Aerial Vehicle in the International Law». Journal of Politics and Law núm. 10. 2016, pp. 1-11.

NIDAL, Jodeh M. Development of autonomous Unmanned Aerial Vehicle research platform: modeling, simulating and flight testing. Tesis. Ohio: Air Force Institute of Technology 2006.

NORTH AMERICAN AEROSPACE DEFENSE COMMAND. Memorandum of understanding between NORAD and the FAA. Colorado: 1987.

NORTH AMERICAN AEROSPACE DEFENSE COMMAND. NORAD intercept procedures, Air Defense Identification Zone, & Temporary Flight Restrictions. Colorado: 2011 [consultado el 3 de abril de 2019]. Disponible en https://www.hsdl.org/?abstract&did=748300.

NORTH AMERICAN AEROSPACE DEFENSE COMMAND. About NORAD. Colorado: 2019 [onsultado el 21 de marzo de 2019]. Disponible en https://www.norad.mil/About-NORAD/.

NORTH AMERICAN AEROSPACE DEFENSE COMMAND. Civil Aviation Resources. Colorado: 2019 [consultado el 21 de marzo de 2019]. Disponible en https://www.norad.mil/General-Aviation/.

PALMER, Adam A. Autonomous UAS: A partial solution to America’s future airpower needs. Alabama: Air Command and Staff College 2010.

PIETRUCHA, Michael W. «The next lightweight fighter. Not your grandfather’s combat aircraft». Air & Space Power Journal. 2013, pp. 39-58.

REILLY, M. B. «Beyond video games: New artificial intelligence beats tactical experts in combat simulation». University of Cincinnati Magazine. 27/06/2016. Disponible en https://magazine.uc.edu.

ROMANIUK, Scott N.; BURGERS, Tobias. «China’s swarms of smart drones have enormous military potential». The Diplomat. 03/02/2018. Disponible en https://thediplomat.com.

RUTGERS UNIVERSITY. Law Review. The FAA and NORAD. Nueva Jersey: 2011 [consultado el 2 de abril de 2019]. Disponible en http://www.rutgerslawreview.com/2011/1-the-faa-and-norad/.

SCHARRE, Paul. «Robotics on the battlefield part II. The coming swarm». Center for a new American security 2014.

THURNHER, Jeffrey S. No one at the controls: the legal implications of fully autonomous targeting. Rhode Island: Naval College of War 2012.

UNITED STATES AIR FORCE. America’s Air Force. A call to the future. Washington D.C.: 2014.

UNITED STATES AIR FORCE. USAF RPA vector. Vision and enabling concepts 2013-2038. Washigton D.C.: 2014.

UNITED STATES AIR FORCE. Air Force future operating concept. A view of the Air Force in 2035. Washington D.C.: 2015.

UNITED STATES AIR FORCE. Annex 3-01. Counterair Operations. Alabama: 2016.

UNITED STATES AIR FORCE. Annex 3-27. Homeland Operations. Alabama: 2016.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE. Department of Defense announces successful micro-drone demonstration. Virginia: 2017 [consultado el 27 de enero de 2019]. Disponible en https://www.defense.gov/Newsroom/Releases/Release/Article/1044811/department-of-defense-announces-successful-micro-drone-demonstration/.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE. Meet the team. Virginia: 2019 [consultado el 20 de marzo de 2019]. Disponible en https://www.defense.gov/Our-Story/Meet-the-Team/.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. Federal Aviation Administration. Washington D.C.: 2019 [consultado el 23 de marzo de 2019]. Disponible en https://www.faa.gov/.

VINCENT, James. «China is worried an AI arms race could lead to accidental war». The Verge. 06/02/2019. Disponible en https://www.theverge.com.

WORK, Robert O.; BRIMLEY Shawn. «Preparing for war in the Robotic Age». Center for a new American security 2014.

Published

2021-02-10

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Prospective analysis of the implications of using autonomous aerial systems in USAF Air Defense Interception Missions. From 2019 to 2035. (2021). Journal of the Spanish Institute for Strategic Studies, 15, 107-136. https://revista.ieee.es/revistaieee/article/view/2091