Past, Present and Future of Geopolitics in the South China Sea
Keywords:
China, South China Sea, Sea, Litigation, Geopolitics, EEZ, Expansionism, maritime limit, sovereignty, A2/ADAbstract
In a globalized world where 90% of trade is carried out by sea, coastal states are aware of the importance and economic value that the exploitation of maritime resources has on a country’s GDP. Tensions to acquire exclusive exploitation rights in the Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) and Continental Shelf generate continuous disagreements. The South China Sea, is one of the most open maritime uptight spaces in the world, where tensions continue to increase due to the richness of the seabed and the enormous density of maritime traffic that navigates through these waters. The economic importance of these routes and the existing natural resources have made the South China Sea basin one of the most tense geopolitical scenarios these days. The clashes between countries reach the point of colliding in the name of this geographical area. The People’s Republic of China calls it the South Sea, Vietnam the East Sea and the Philippines the West Philippine Sea. These etymological differences reflect the different legal claims that each country faces. This space is a maritime border that marks sovereignty, guarantees transit through its waters and grants the right to exploit underground resources. This study tries to illustrate the geopolitical tensions in the area, analysing the actors involved, the evolution of litigation and the possible consequences that the latest movements in China will have in the near future.
References
Akal. (2005). El estado del mundo. Anuario económico geopolítico mundial. Editorial Akal.
Baqués, J. (2017). Hacia una definición del concepto "Gray Zone". IEEE, Documento de investigación 02/2017.
General Assembly - United Nations. (s.f.). eSubscription to United Nations Documents. Obtenido de https://undocs.org/.
Genova, A. (2018). National Geographic. Two nations disputed these small islands for 300 years. Recuperado el 18 de diciemnbre de 2020, de https://www.nationalgeographic.com/travel/destinations/asia/south-korea/history-dispute-photos-dodko-rocks-islands/.
King, D. L. (15 de 08 de 2011). The Phantom Menace. The New York Times.
Kissinger, H. (1979). THE WHITE HOUSE YEARS, YEARS OF UPHEAVAL, DIPLOMACY, YEARS OF RENEWAL 4 HARDBACK BOOKS (MEMOIRS). Little Brown & Co.
Klare, M. T. (2003). Guerras por los recursos el futuro escenario del conflicto global. Urano S.A.
Lalinde, L. M. (2019). as islas Spratly: el conflicto que separa a China de los países del Sudeste Asiático. Observatorio de la política China.
Mackinlay, A. (2012). Mar de China Meridional. Panorama Geopolitico de los Conflictos. Instituto Español de Estudios Estratégicos (IEEE).
Manso, E. P. (2008). El petróleo y el gas en la geoestrategia mundial. Madrid, España: Ediciones Akal.
Mar, D. d. (1996). Boletín del Derecho del Mar Número 32. Oficina de Asuntos Jurídicos.
Ministerio de Defensa. (2016). Manual de Derecho del Mar. Madrid: Imprenta Ministerio de Defensa.
Parada, J. G. (2013). La actuación de la República de China (Taiwán) como Estado de Facto en el Sistema Internacional, periodo 1971 - 2011.
Robert S. Ross, Ø. T. (2014). Strategic Adjustment and the Rise of China: Power and Politics in East Asia. Oslo: Norwegian Defence university College.
RPC Government. (s.f.). White Pappers of the Government. Obtenido de http://www.china.org.cn/e-white/
U.S. Department of Defense. (2015). The Guidelines for Japan-U.S. Defense Cooperation.
United Nations. (10 December 1982). United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). Jamaica.
US Department of Defense. (2019). Indo-Pacific Strategy Report.
Yoshihara, T. (2016). The 1974 Paracels Sea Battle: A Campaign Appraisal. The U.S. Naval War College.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Se permite y anima a los autores a difundir sus trabajos electrónicamente (por ejemplo, en repositorios institucionales o en su propio sitio web) después de la publicación de la revista, para favorecer intercambios productivos, así como una citación más temprana y mayor de los trabajos publicados (Véase The Effect of Open Access).

